PROBLEMS IN IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF SMALL BUSINESSES AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS


Date Published : 21 June 2025

Contributors

Otabek Azamatov

Author

DOI

Keywords

Small business competitiveness innovation SME financing digital transformation management training regulatory reform entrepreneurship economic development.

Proceeding

Track

General Track

Abstract

This thesis examines the key challenges that limit the competitiveness of small businesses and outlines scientific solutions to address them. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) represent the majority of global businesses and contribute significantly to employment and innovation. However, their growth is often restricted by limited access to finance, weak technological capacity, managerial inefficiencies, regulatory burdens, and poor integration into markets. Drawing on current data and international case studies, this research identifies proven strategies to overcome these barriers. These include financial reforms, digital transformation, management training, simplified regulations, and participation in business clusters. Successful examples from Germany, South Korea, and Estonia demonstrate the impact of supportive policies and innovation-driven ecosystems. The findings emphasize the need for coordinated efforts between government, industry, and institutions to build a more resilient and competitive SME sector. This work contributes to policy design and academic understanding of sustainable small business development.

References

1. Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Innovation and industry evolution. MIT Press. 284 p.
2. Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013). Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 50–51.
3. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 35–37.
4. Ghosh, S. (2016). Fintech and financial inclusion: The role of mobile banking and other digital channels in emerging markets. IMF Working Paper. 331 p.
5. IFC. (2017). MSME Finance Gap: Assessment of the Shortfalls and Opportunities in Financing Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in Emerging Markets. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.
6. ILO. (2020). Skills for a Resilient Youth: Building Better Jobs for the Future. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
7. Kalvet, T. (2012). Innovation: A factor explaining e-government success in Estonia. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 9(2), 156–157.
8. OECD. (2017). Enhancing the Contributions of SMEs in a Global and Digitalised Economy. Paris: OECD.
9. OECD. (2018). SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.
10. OECD. (2021). Digital Transformation of SMEs. Paris: OECD Publishing.
11. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, 154.
12. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press, 231-232 p.
13. Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 33–34.
14. Schmitz, H. (1995). Collective efficiency: Growth path for small-scale industry. Journal of Development Studies, 31(4), 565–566.
15. UNCTAD. (2019). Empowering SMEs through E-commerce and Trade Facilitation. Geneva: United Nations.
16. UNIDO. (2021). Promoting SME Competitiveness in Global Value Chains. Vienna: UNIDO.
17. World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
18. World Economic Forum. (2023). The Future of SMEs: Unlocking Innovation and Growth. Geneva: WEF.

Downloads

How to Cite

Otabek, O. (2025). PROBLEMS IN IMPROVING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF SMALL BUSINESSES AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS. “OʻZBEKISTON — 2030: INNOVATSIYA, FAN VA TAʼLIM ISTIQBOLLARI” Mavzusidagi Respublika Ilmiy-Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 1(2), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.47390/978-9910-09-204-6/uzb-09