Leconfe
“OʻZBEKISTON — 2030: INNOVATSIYA, FAN VA TAʼLIM ISTIQBOLLARI” mavzusidagi Respublika ilmiy-amaliy konferensiyasi

ISTE’MOLCHI HUQUQLARINI HIMOYA QILISHDA ROMAN-GERMAN VA ANGLO-SAKSON HUQUQIY TIZIMLARIDAGI O‘ZIGA XOS XUSUSIYATLAR

Nashr qilingan sana: 15 July 2025

Hissa qo‘shganlar

Farida Allambergenova

Author

DOI

DOI 10.47390/978-9910-09-222-0/uzb-08

Kalit so‘zlar

iste’molchi huquqlari elektron tijorat roman-german huquqiy tizimi anglo-sakson tizimi normativ tartib sud pretsedenti axborot berish majburiyati ongli rozilik

Materiallar to‘plami

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): OʻZBEKISTON – 2030: INNOVATSIYA, FAN VA TAʼLIM ISTIQBOLLARI. III Respublika ilmiy-amaliy konferensiyasi materiallari

Yo‘nalish

General Track

Annotatsiya

Mazkur tezisda iste’molchi huquqlarini huquqiy himoya qilish masalasiga ikki asosiy huquqiy tizim – roman-german va anglo-sakson yondashuvlari asosida chuqur tahliliy qarash bildirilgan. Xususan, elektron tijorat munosabatlarida iste’molchilarning manfaatlarini kafolatlashda bu ikki tizim o‘rtasidagi asosiy farqlar – huquq manbalarining ustuvorligi, normativ qat’iylik, sud pretsedentlariga asoslangan dinamizm va davlat regulyatorlarining ishtiroki – izchil yoritilgan. Yevropa Ittifoqi, Germaniya, Fransiya, Buyuk Britaniya, AQSh va Kanada tajribasi asosida axborot berish majburiyati, shartnoma shartlarining adolatliligi, ongli rozilik, kollektiv da’vo va ODR/ADR mexanizmlarining o‘rni ochib berilgan. Shu asosda O‘zbekiston Respublikasida iste’molchi huquqlarini elektron tijorat doirasida yanada samarali muhofaza qilish uchun tizimli va gibrid yondashuvlar asosidagi huquqiy strategiya ishlab chiqish zarurligi asoslangan.

Manbalar

1. Zweigert, K. & Kötz, H., An Introduction to Comparative Law. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
2. Markesinis, B. S., Unberath, H. & Johnston, A., The German Law of Contract: A Comparative Treatise. 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008.
3. European Union, Directive 2011/83/EU on Consumer Rights, 25 October 2011.
4. UK Parliament, Consumer Rights Act 2015, c.15.
5. Howells, G., Twigg-Flesner, C. and Willett, C., Consumer Protection Law, 2nd edn, Routledge, 2018.
6. Micklitz, H.-W., The Politics of Judicial Co-operation in the EU, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
7. European Union, Directive 2011/83/EU on Consumer Rights, 25 October 2011.
8. Weatherill, S., EU Consumer Law and Policy, 2nd edn, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.
9. Craig, P. and de Búrca, G., EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 7th edn, Oxford University Press, 2020.
10. European Union, Directive 2019/770/EU on Digital Content and Digital Services, 20 May 2019.
11. Consumer Rights Act 2015 (UK), Part 1–2.
12. UCC §2-314. Implied Warranty: Merchantability; Usage of Trade (USA).
13. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Truth in Advertising Guidelines, 2022.
14. Hodges, C., Delivering Dispute Resolution: A Holistic Review of Models in England and Wales, Hart Publishing, 2016.
15. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [BGB], §13.
16. Code civil (France), Articles L.212-1 et seq.
17. Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), Urteil vom 09.05.2006 – XI ZR 29/05.
18. Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011.
19. DGCCRF official site: https://www.economie.gouv.fr/dgccrf
20. Cafaggi, F. and Micklitz, H.-W. (2009). New Frontiers of Consumer Protection. Oxford University Press.
21. Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB), § 476
23. Code de la consommation, Art. L111-1
24. R. von. Der Zweck im Recht, 1877; Kelsen, H. Pure Theory of Law, 1934.

Yuklab olishlar

Qanday iqtibos keltirish kerak

Farida , F. . (2025). ISTE’MOLCHI HUQUQLARINI HIMOYA QILISHDA ROMAN-GERMAN VA ANGLO-SAKSON HUQUQIY TIZIMLARIDAGI O‘ZIGA XOS XUSUSIYATLAR. “OʻZBEKISTON — 2030: INNOVATSIYA, FAN VA TAʼLIM ISTIQBOLLARI” Mavzusidagi Respublika Ilmiy-Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 1(3), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.47390/978-9910-09-222-0/uzb-08