CLASSICAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF EUPHEMISMS: SEMANTIC, PRAGMATIC AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES
Nashr qilingan sana: 5 August 2025
Hissa qo‘shganlar
Mavjuda Eshchanova
Author
DOI
Kalit so‘zlar
euphemism
semantic approach
pragmatic approach
functional classification
metaphor
politeness
taboo
discourse
cross-cultural
communication
Materiallar to‘plami
Yo‘nalish
General Track
Annotatsiya
This paper examines the classical taxonomies of euphemisms through three primary theoretical frameworks: semantic, pragmatic, and functional approaches. Euphemisms, as linguistic phenomena that substitute direct expressions with more socially acceptable alternatives, have been systematically categorized by scholars to understand their structural properties, contextual applications, and communicative functions
Manbalar
1. Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge University Press.
2. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
3. Holder, R. W. (2008). Dictionary of Euphemisms. Oxford University Press.
4. Hughes, G. (2006). An Encyclopedia of Swearing: The Social History of Oaths, Profanity, Foul Language, and Ethnic Slurs. M.E. Sharpe.
5. Warren, B. (1992). What euphemisms tell us about the interpretation of words. Studia Linguistica, 46(2), 128-172.
Yuklab olishlar
Qanday iqtibos keltirish kerak
Mavjuda , M. . (2025). CLASSICAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF EUPHEMISMS: SEMANTIC, PRAGMATIC AND FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES. “OʻZBEKISTON — 2030: INNOVATSIYA, FAN VA TAʼLIM ISTIQBOLLARI” Mavzusidagi Respublika Ilmiy-Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 1(4), 113-115. https://doi.org/10.47390/259-6/uzb-IV/No-25